首页> 外文OA文献 >Heavy Metal and Trace Metal Analysis in Soil by Sequential Extraction: A Review of Procedures
【2h】

Heavy Metal and Trace Metal Analysis in Soil by Sequential Extraction: A Review of Procedures

机译:顺序萃取法分析土壤中的重金属和痕量金属:方法综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Quantification of heavy and trace metal contamination in soil can be arduous, requiring the use of lengthy and intricate extraction procedures which may or may not give reliable results. Of the many procedures in publication, some are designed to operate within specific parameters while others are designed for more broad application. Most procedures have been modified since their inception which creates ambiguity as to which procedure is most acceptable in a given situation. For this study, the Tessier, Community Bureau of Reference (BCR), Short, Galán, and Geological Society of Canada (GCS) procedures were examined to clarify benefits and limitations of each. Modifications of the Tessier, BCR, and GCS procedures were also examined. The efficacy of these procedures is addressed by looking at the soils used in each procedure, the limitations, applications, and future of sequential extraction.
机译:土壤中重金属和痕量金属污染的量化工作可能很艰巨,需要使用冗长而复杂的提取程序,这可能会或可能不会提供可靠的结果。在公开的许多程序中,有些程序被设计为在特定参数内运行,而另一些程序则被设计为更广泛的应用。自从开始以来,大多数程序都已进行了修改,这导致在给定情况下哪种程序最可接受的模棱两可。在本研究中,对Tessier,社区参考局(BCR),Short,Galán和加拿大地质学会(GCS)程序进行了检查,以阐明每种方法的优点和局限性。还检查了Tessier,BCR和GCS程序的修改。通过查看每个过程中使用的污垢,局限性,应用和连续提取的未来,可以解决这些过程的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号